Page 13 - thesecrethistoryoftheworld
P. 13


















Note to the Reader About the Cassiopaeans






The term “Cassiopaeans” appears in several places in this book. While the 

information contained in this book could as well be given without referring to this 

term, it is better to point out the source of the inspiration. The name Cassiopaea 
was given by a source contacted by LKJ in 1994 after a two year long experiment 

in superluminal communication. The source identified itself by saying “we are you 

in the future”. Modern physics does not provide us with practical means for this 

type of communication and theories on this subject are not well developed; they 

are, in fact, inconclusive and controversial.
When interpreting “we are you in the future” in an oversimplified way, we are 

faced with causal paradoxes. On the other hand, from the theoretical papers 

published in physics journals we can learn that, with a proper and careful 

interpretation, and taking into account quantum uncertainties, communication into 
the past cannot be dismissed as impossible. Improbable perhaps is the right word, 

but there are many things that are improbable and yet happen. The more 

improbable is a given phenomenon, the more information is carried by its 

occurrence, the more we can learn by its study. That is why we did not dismiss the 
“we are you in the future” as impossible and therefore ignorable. Instead we 

decided to continue the “communications” as a form of a controlled experiment in 

“superluminal thought transfer” – even if it was clear that the term should be 

considered as a tentative indication of only one out several possible 
interpretations.

The information received from this experiment is presented in the context of 

broad ranging historical, scientific and other metaphysical material and offers the 

clues that have led to the world view and inferences presented by us in our 
numerous publications on the Web and in print. Perhaps it is only our own 

“subconscious mind” that presents itself as a “source”, but even if it is so, does 

that tell us more? Do we really know what “unconscious mind” is and of what is it 

capable?
We sometimes ask ourselves if the Cassiopaeans are who they say they are, 

because we do not take anything as unquestionable truth. We take everything with 

a grain of salt, even if we consider that there is a good chance that it is truth. We 

are constantly analyzing this material as well as a great quantity of other material 

that comes to our attention from numerous fields of science and mysticism.
We invite the reader to share in our seeking of Truth by reading with an open, 

but skeptical mind. We do not encourage “devotee-ism” nor “True Belief”. We do 

encourage the seeking of Knowledge and Awareness in all fields of endeavor as 

the best way to be able to discern lies from truth. The one thing we can tell the









   11   12   13   14   15